http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2924
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-14 16:19 -------
Darxus, you're right. Here're the relevant parts from the RFCs (yeah, I know
you've all read em often enough but I've copied those parts anyway ;~):
RFC 2822:
3.6.7 Trace fields
received = "Received:" name-val-list ";" date-time CRLF
name-val-list = [CFWS] [name-val-pair *(CFWS name-val-pair)]
name-val-pair = item-name CFWS item-value
item-name = ALPHA *(["-"] (ALPHA / DIGIT))
item-value = 1*angle-addr / addr-spec /
atom / domain / msg-id
3.4.1. Addr-spec specification
domain = dot-atom / domain-literal / obs-domain
domain-literal = [CFWS] "[" *([FWS] dcontent) [FWS] "]" [CFWS]
3.2.4. Atom
atom = [CFWS] 1*atext [CFWS]
dot-atom = [CFWS] dot-atom-text [CFWS]
dot-atom-text = 1*atext *("." 1*atext)
RFC 2821:
4.4 Trace Information
Time-stamp-line = "Received:" FWS Stamp <CRLF>
Stamp = From-domain By-domain Opt-info ";" FWS date-time
From-domain = "FROM" FWS Extended-Domain CFWS
Extended-Domain = Domain /
( Domain FWS "(" TCP-info ")" ) /
( Address-literal FWS "(" TCP-info ")" )
TCP-info = Address-literal / ( Domain FWS Address-literal )
; Information derived by server from TCP connection
; not client EHLO.
To make it short:
"from" Domain Address-literal
is not allowed. Patch follows.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
