http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2990
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-31 13:10 ------- Subject: Re: proposed interim rules for 2.64 bugzilla-daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > -1 on this. I'll be perfectly happy with: > > score HABEAS_SWE -1 -8 -1 -8 > > but not -1 across the board -- if VIOLATOR can be hit (ie: net-enabled > score set), we should leave the score as-is. VIOLATOR can be hit, but it isn't being hit. I have 15 hits for HABEAS_SWE in my missed spam folder and 0 HABEAS_VIOLATOR hits. HABEAS_VIOLATOR is completely ineffective. It's responsible for 10% of my missed spam with 2.6x. For caught spam, I have 27 HABEAS_SWE hits and only 14 HABEAS_VIOLATOR hits. That also is not very good. When I changed the score from -4 to -8, it was on the premise that the rule was working for SpamAssassin users. In the face of compromised open proxies, I think the honeymoon is over, this rule is no better than any simple header negative rule we've ever had. A score of 0 is probably better than -1 for non-network score sets and is consistent with our policy against easily-forged rules. Daniel ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
