http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2191
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-02 21:32 ------- Found another non-porn / non-spam site that matches the PORN_4 rule and shouldn't: http://www.lensexpress.com (matches "sex" within the URI). I recognize the difficulty of SA differentiating between a "lens express" site and a "len sex press" site, but given the large number of non-porn hits for this rule, I do hope 2.7 will find a way to improve upon this record. (Meanwhile, reducing the score for this rule within my systems.) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
