[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > DNSBL changes > - rename RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK to RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL > - change multi-RBLs into prerequisite tests for better stability > - promote RCVD_IN_XBL, switch to new version of SBL+XBL rule > - fix T_RCVD_IN_SORBS_NOMAIL and T_RCVD_IN_SORBS_BADCONF to query > the SORBS RHSBL
Note that we now have a few rules with scores well above 5 because of the second change (since the score for the top-level rule for multi-RBLs was distributed amongst the subtests that existed when we ran the GA last). The end-result is the same, but fewer false positives (since we're avoiding new subtests causing the top-level test to trigger more often than it was at the time of the GA). I suspect lowering them would cause too many FNs due to the tuning against all the other rules, so I think we should just leave them alone until we reoptimize network scores. Daniel
