http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3049
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-15 21:00 ------- Subject: Re: Implement sa-learn --loaddb dumpfile functionality On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 08:52:55PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yeah, this sounds good. I'll obviously need to keep the nspam and nham Ooh, right ... If you're only dealing with the toks db, you would need that... :| > tokens. I can calculate the oldest/newest atimes and ntokens. How > about the various sync/expire tokens? Anyone see a problem with just > zeroing them out? No issues. You'll want to do that anyway since the estimations will be useless if the DBs tokens were changed. > Yeah, I was thinking the data displayed would be bogus if it wasn't a > version 2 database, but perhaps this is the wrong assumption. I'm > still gonna check and fail if it isn't. Hrm. I gotcha now. Yeah, you'd still want to check against the macro value though, not hardcoded 2. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
