http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2607
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-17 10:28 ------- >I think Dan's right, this can go into 2.6x. Can somebody please confirm his CLA has arrived? Well, the turnaround on checking CLAs is not quite so simple. We have to ask Jim Jagielski and wait a while for him to check the incoming fax queue ;) I suggest that if (a) the patch is going into 3.0.0 -- which has more lax requirements for CLAs due to the new license text -- and (b) the reporter has gone on record on the Bugzilla noting that they've sent the CLA, that's good enough. In this case anyway, the patch is very small. under ASL2 rules it doesn't strictly require a CLA for changes of this size. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
