http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2328





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-02-18 15:26 -------
Perhaps the rule should be modified to something like "(?!\w)cum"? (doesn't look
 quite right) or maybe even: "\Wcum"

Prone to abuse like "_cum"... but a three letter spam sign is bound to hit some
ham if not escaped somehow...



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to