I think we now have enough committers to just use the standard Apache review process, so I propose that we officially adopt the standard way:
http://incubator.apache.org/learn/voting.html Background: we were using a slight modification of the Apache voting procedure in R-T-C mode (prior to joining the Apache incubator) where two +1 votes were sufficient if there were no votes of -0 or lower plus a 24 hour waiting period after the second +1 vote to allow a third person a chance to review and vote. Rationale: Getting two people to review something seems easier than it used to be. And if code scares too many people to be reviewed by two other people, it's probably too complicated or the author needs to convince everyone that it has been extremely well-tested. If it's hard to get people connected with bugs to review code modifications, maybe we should set up a keyword for that in Bugzilla. Note this only changes things in R-T-C mode. That is, it only significantly affects development of stable and during feature and code freezes prior to branching stable. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan anti-spam (SpamAssassin), Linux, http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ and open source consulting
