http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3048
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-20 07:27 ------- Subject: Re: bayesdbm.t, test 37 takes ages On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 07:22:13AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Indeed. I was using 4.1.25, upgrading to 4.2.52 seems to make the > delay go away. I went from 1m39.295s to 0m21.568s to run all of the > tests. Heh. > Question: Should we just call this a Berkeley DB bug (possibly this > one from their change log: Fix a bug where contention in the buffer > pool could cause the buffer allocation algorithm to unnecessarily > sleep waiting for buffers to be freed. [#7572])? or should we figure > out if we're just tickling it somehow and correct that. IMO, we should see if there's a way to work around their bug since 4.1.25 is a standard for certain OS distros out there (RHEL [AE]S 3 for instance). If there isn't, or it isn't easy, then calling it a bug in their lib is fine and we can just note it in the FAQ. I wouldn't spend too much time on this since it's a known bug in the lib. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
