-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Duncan Findlay writes: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 01:10:23PM +0000, Owen McShane wrote: > > I've been looking into this for a while now, and it would seem that it is > > not that tunable. > > > > Can any SA developers tell me if spamd will actually start freaking out > > after it's queued 5 connections over the max-children limit? > > > > If it does, would replacing all references to SOMAXCONN in spamd with a > > pre-defined variable (1024 say) be adhered to? > > I think it's an OS specific thing -- Solaris will not queue more > connections than SOMAXCONN. You can try it, I just don't know if it > will work. Yes, SOMAXCONN is there for a reason ;) I'm pretty sure (from my days as a solaris sysadmin) that it *is* possible to increase the kernel-level limit. This would be essential to queue up processes, as we don't accept the conn until there's a free child to process it. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAPNfIQTcbUG5Y7woRAg8KAJ9CAzGYXan4W7u/v15FYCAvW1NlIQCdGqVa iXQ2BoSEYI2XR4NANtaGbIc= =FPOy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
