On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 12:08:21AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The report_safe format should *always* be an message/rfc822 attachment. > It's foolproof, easy, and standard -- we should stick by it.
Yeah, as long as we keep the detection of that markup the same, it doesn't matter what the contents are. > Now, removing markup from non-marked-as-spam messages is always going to > be a bit more up in the air, but I think we should also try to keep this > as stable as possible from version to version. I think we've done pretty well at this, although we could standardize more. For instance, we've pretty much claimed the X-Spam-* header space, so removing the markup there is as easy as dropping all those headers. Old (2.4x and before) did the whole X-Spam-Prev-* thing for content-type and the like. I think we should continue to support that generically by using the following algorithm and making subject/from/to rewriting put the original in X-Spam-Prev format (as was already brought up on the list): 1) For each X-Spam-Prev-(.+) header in the message, delete $1 and rename X-Spam-Prev-$1 to $1. 2) Delete all X-Spam-.* headers in the message It keeps things all standardized, removes us needing to load the configs to figure out the rewrite RE, etc, etc. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "I believe in getting into hot water; it keeps you clean." - G. K. Chesterton
pgpvXzaHXPjkk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
