http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3109
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-28 19:02 ------- Subject: Re: RFE: really simple "this is ham" shortcircuiting -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >- priority of zero is default >- less than zero means run early >- more than zero means run later +1 on those >- score of "ham" or "spam" means mark as ham or spam and short circuit, no > numeric score should be generated since the score number would be inaccurate Suggest generating a score of -9999 or 9999 -- otherwise I can guarantee it'll confuse tools that act on X-Spam-Status. Plus it'd make mass-check results pretty hard to parse too ;) 'all_spam_to' already uses a very-low-score hack, this is similar (but less hacky). Also I'd prefer if it wasn't using the "score" command; a new one like "shortcircuit ham", or even "tflags short-circuit-ham" strikes me as better. re: autolearning: that's a hard one, since this would be how all_spam_to would be implemented. Maybe 2 ways of saying ham, one indicating that the msg is autolearnable, one indicating not? - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAQVZXQTcbUG5Y7woRAufbAKCQ1j7aOpQ3ecPHJD/Y4WdeI5X2EgCg1XQe R6WnLb5voTZe1utLhPajtz0= =8442 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
