> It could be that the docs != the code. But we're not really paying > attention to 2.6x anymore and focusing solely on 3.0.0.
I re-read that carefully, and, yes, there is a doc/code difference. I you release a 2.64 (as you mentioned beeing a possibility in one of your emails). This might need correction. Would you like me to input this as a bug ? > If you'd like to grab a 3.0 tarball and verify that the docs == the code, > we'd appreciate it! :) Should I review the whole code/doc ? ;-) As far as I could see regarding this "full" vs/ "full w/o attachments" concern, the code looks ok in the actual svn code. Thanks.
