http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3128
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-06 16:24 ------- Subject: Re: Should AUTHOR be the project now? > For 3.0.0 I'm going to have to rewrite this file to update with the > new license, etc, and I'll be happy to add the rest of the committers > or ASF or SpamAssassin Project, whatever. (I don't know why I didn't > originally include all the committers) Yeah, we can (and I think should) probably just list the project as a whole rather than individual authors. > I don't see any benefit of SpamAssassin providing it's own .deb, but > I'd be interested in your reasoning. It might be convenient for people running woody. I've been using the SpamAssassin 2.63 package from backports.org. We could just link to that, I suppose. Daniel ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
