http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-13 23:49 ------- Subject: Re: Bayes tweaks to test > Quite a bit better -- 7% less FNs than the best of before, no increase > in FPs. It's checked in now. Fantastic! > One issue: I've duplicated rendering code this way, because I wasn't > sure if we want to simply *replace* the current body rendering to > remove invis text, or not. Do we? Yes and no. We don't need to render invisible text for most body tests, however there are some tests that specifically look for random text (such as the unique_words code), very effective tests, so we need to figure out the appropriate way to handle those. I might try this: 1. run a normal mass-check, local only, no bayes 2. experimentally change the body rendering so that invisible text is not rendered 3. re-run the mass-check 4. freqdiff and see which spam rules are most reduced in SPAM% 5. then we can consider what to do about it Daniel ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
