-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

"Gary Funck" writes:
> 1.0 RCVD_BY_IP             Received by mail server with no name
> 1.7 BAYES_80               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 80 to 90%
>                            [score: 0.8586]
> 3.0 MPART_ALT_DIFF         BODY: HTML and text parts are different
> 1.0 RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE   Received: by and from look like IP addresses
>
>----
>
>the RCVD_BY_IP may be an artifact of the fact that I obscured the IP
>addresses,
>and I ran the dev. version of SA on a machine where things like
>"trusted_networks"
>isn't defined. I found it odd, that on this machine Bayes kicked in with
>BAYES_80, but on my production machine, running SA 2.63, this message was
>scored as follows:

What happened to BIZ_TLD there? hmm.

Anyway, RCVD_BY_IP, MPART_ALT_DIFF, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE are all new
3.0.0 rules, and will probably get high scores because they seem very
reliable.  BAYES_80 could be explained by the new Bayes tokenization
rules...

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFAXg+MQTcbUG5Y7woRAn8xAKCY4AI7WrTPmZEYh2LvoOUXhkF9kACfaXOY
GLW0d0DT+udg2HXlaFl5X1M=
=96Zm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to