http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3216

           Summary: Received header rules, multiple IP
           Product: Spamassassin
           Version: 2.63
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P5
         Component: Rules
        AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Rule offered to me from someone not on SA lists, 

> The rule below was sent to me by Regis Wilson. He offered me the rule,
> validating whether it's generally useful, and asking me to post it if it
> works.
> 
> It works!  Results of my mass-check here:
> 
> Section 3 -- Frequencies Log
> (First numeric frequencies, followed by percentage frequencies)
> 
> OVERALL     SPAM      HAM     S/O   SCORE  NAME
>  119325    98981    20344    0.830   0.00    0.00  (all messages)
>    9199     9198        1    0.999   0.00   3.00  SUSP_IP_RECEIVED
> 
> OVERALL%   SPAM%     HAM%     S/O    RANK   SCORE  NAME
>  119325    98981    20344    0.830   0.00    0.00  (all messages)
> 100.000  82.9508  17.0492    0.830   0.00    0.00  (all messages as %)
>   7.709   9.2927   0.0049    0.999   0.00    3.00  SUSP_IP_RECEIVED
> 
> Matched 9.3% of all spam in my corpus, and matched only 1 ham.
> 
> So I responded back to him, asking
> RM> I'd like to not only post it, but submit it to the SpamAssassin Devs
> RM> for consideration in their next release. Do you give your permission
> RM> for them to include and distribute the rule with no conditions?
> 
> His response to me, Thu, 25 Mar 2004 07:43:24 -0800 (PST), message id
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, was:
> > Yes, absolutely.

Rule as follows: 

header   SUSP_IP_RECEIVED  Received =~ /from\s+((?:1?\d\d?|2[0-4]\d|25[0-4])\.)
{3}(?:1?\d\d?|2[0-4]\d|25[0-4])\s+by\s+((?:1?\d\d?|2[0-4]\d|25[0-4])\.){3}(?:1?
\d\d?|2[0-4]\d|25[0-4])/i
describe SUSP_IP_RECEIVED  Received line is suspicious (from IP by IP)
score    SUSP_IP_RECEIVED  3.0



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to