-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes: > No FPs, but the SPAM% is rather low. I suspect the problem is that > SURBL is a direct listing of URIs whereas URIBL does the NS->A->RBL > mapping. It's also *very* new -- I suspect it could do with more data ;) Anyone got an address for the operator? I can send on over a partial spamtrap feed from our server (100MBytes of spam per day), or similar. IMO, expiring after 4 days is *way* too early. At least a month would be better -- otherwise it allows spammers to "recycle" old domains very quickly after their use in spam. And finally, I think we should add a new rule eval fn to URIBL, to allow URIs to be looked up against an RHSBL-style list. That should be faster, as it'd mean no need for the NS and A sets of lookups. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAZ7trQTcbUG5Y7woRAhotAKDu3jEOTmsdPXAV2fun6ZITeqUplQCgvWeh DAaReyOO5vy5rDDC8r5eiUM= =rfqH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
