http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3226
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-29 12:27 -------
'actually could you edit the message to put a space between : and ; on the To
line and see if that still trips one of the tests? because of sendmail bugs
a lot of people receive the message with a space between : and ;.'
That's fine. it has that space, and the "TO_HAS_SPACES" rule is picking that
up, but it's not providing any worrisome quantity of points.
the SA ruleset has several "levels" of scores --
1. really serious rules that are high accuracy. OPT_HEADER was such a rule, but
occasionally threw up false positives -- quite a few -- so we've thrown it out
now.
2. not-serious-at-all rules that are low accuracy, but when combined with one or
more big-hitter rules can push a borderline spam just over the threshold.
TO_HAS_SPACES is a good example. it's got such a low score, it's displayed as
0.0 in that report ;) these are very low accuracy, and just provide a little
nudge -- so a hit from these on nonspam is most definitely not a problem, and
frequently happen.
3. others which are in between. irrelevant to this discussion.
so, seriously, no need to worry about the TO_HAS_SPACES hit, it will not affect
anything -- no message will be marked as spam if it hits that, unless it hits
some other, more serious rules, in which case *those* are the hits to worry
about.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
