On Friday, April 2, 2004, 4:23:51 PM, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
>> Side issue: why use easy removal without questions? Spammers do not have >> the bandwidth to remove themselves from every list. If they *do* go to >> the bother, and a URL does get removed, then repeatedly crops up in spam >> again, it should be raised as an alarm -- and possibly brought to the >> notice of other people -- e.g. this list or others. > I'm not so sure easy removal is actually a good idea. I think it's > better to have FP-prevention mechanisms that don't require attention of > the email sender. Can you cite some examples of FP-prevention strategies? Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
