> > The RED and BLUE tags seem moderately useful in conjunction with big
> > font checks.
>
> Perhaps, but we don't have a rule for that.
Yes, but I do. If the font color check goes away, then I won't, which will
be a net loss for my spam checking abilities.
meta LW_BIG_AND_RED (HTML_FONT_BIG && HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED)
describe LW_BIG_AND_RED BIG RED TEXT
score LW_BIG_AND_RED 3
Similar check exists for LW_BIG_BLUE_TEXT.
> > The COLOR_UNSAFE rule would be very useful if it worked better. It
> > seems to catch a lot of the fffffe and fefefe type colors on a white
> > background, but it misses a lot fo them also, such as when the color
> > value is 2 lines after the keyword.
>
> The main problem is that it hits more ham than spam.
And as written it doesn't catch a lot of the bogus values, although it
catches some of them. I believe I said above "if it worked better". This
rule needs sharpening, not deleting.
Loren
