http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3276
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-16 11:55 ------- Subject: Re: Invalid max-children (-m) option description On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 10:18:53AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hmm. this is a new feature that Theo just added -- doco below. I'd suggest > making it two separate options, IMO, so that we can use GetOptions()' parsing > code, and also because the functionality is slightly separate from > --max-children. The good news is that I don't think it needs to be a short > option, a --long-option alone would be fine I think. --max-conns-per-child? yeah, that'd be fine. I needed to add the option somewhere, and just tacked it onto -m, apparently not completely, without spending too much time polishing it up. I'll make it another option and commit the new version in a few minutes. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
