>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> Maybe it'll be used by some spammers and will be worth a
Daniel> rule, but it's not that exciting.
Well, in a world where spam filters were properly under the control of
their users (rather than their ISPs) and easily configurable, there'd
be little disincentive for porn spammers to comply.
Porn spammers aren't exactly going to make any money out of people who
dislike porn, and those people who actively want this mail (I'm sure
they exist) would quickly learn how to accept it.
I guess it all boils down to whether you're a CAN-SPAM hater, or see
it as a (small) step in the right direction...
-roy
