On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 11:22:45PM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Minor nitpick: I think you mean sets 0 and 2 (i.e. no net with and > > without bayes) > > mass-check run 1 is for the non-bayes sets. A single --net mass-check > is sufficient since you can just strip out the network results and > generate both of the no-net sets (sets 0 and 1).
Right. I'd forgotten about the need for Bayes to have good scores. (I did remember that you cant run 2 and 3 with one command) > >> 05/26: generate scores, etc. > >> > >> 05/31: announce mass-check run 2 (sets 2 and 3), run until 06/11. > > > > Again: sets 1 and 3 (net with and without bayes) > > mass-check run 2 is for with the bayes sets. The first set of scores is > needed to do accurate autolearning for _these_ runs. It *does* require > two separate mass-check commands since different sets of scores are > being used for auto-learning. Ah... that's where my confusion was. I remembered that we need 3 mass-checks but I couldn't remember exactly which ones. And I agree, they can be done simultaneously. > Maybe this should be documented since it seems like we end up > rediscussing it every release. We all know we're bad at documenting stuff ;-) How about we document this in the Wiki perhaps under: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DevelopmentStuff (Any volunteers...?) -- Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
