-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes: > Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The issue here is -- should mass-check be de-encapsulating this mail? > > It wasn't encapped by *your* SpamAssassin installation. hmm. > > > > Anyone got ideas on how to handle this? > > I think mass-check shouldn't be de-encapsulating email that wasn't > encapsulated locally. A regular expression based on the checking host > name seems like the way to go, something that can be stored in a > configuration file. > > Obviously, de-encapsulation should never be done in a normal check. OK -- mass-check now has a --deencap RE switch to allow this. Specify an RE that matches the hosts that are adding the report in your corpus. default is to de-encapsulate all mails otherwise. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAiGvaQTcbUG5Y7woRAgsQAKCan8wJ8cschqhb/G2q4tvUF/NprwCg02H8 Fyqe+FPE+v+mMeE1EChEszE= =OOA8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
