http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2266
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-27 22:10 ------- Subject: Re: New features: Tokens in report, status of Bayesian classification. On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 10:00:03PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2266 > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-27 22:00 ------- > I could think of two ways that it might make sense with hashed tokens. > > One is if hashing tokens is a configuration option. Someone with a low enough > volume of mail might prefer to keep the ability to look at the tokens. Considered, but it complicates lots of things (setup, backup/restore, dump, etc). If we're gonna go some of the way, might as well go all the way. > The other is if there were a utility similar to sa-learn that creates a > database > of tokens keyed by their hashes. Then if someone cared to find out what the > original token is for a hash they could look it up. > Ugh, I guess, but doesn't sounds pretty. If folks really want to see which tokens were used to score the msg, I suppose we could push the token hashing stuff down into the storage layer. I'll look into that. Michael ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
