http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3331
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-29 11:38 ------- 'all we are interested in having is the ability to usually look up the original text given a hash when doing some analysis, but the mapping does not have to be maintained, expired, etc., to the same degtree of precisions and reliability as the rest of the database.' agreed. BTW, I know Dan was expressing some concerns last night about exposing too much of the bayes data, saying that even with that info, it's not much use for people to do stuff with -- sure, you know that token "foo.html" is a good spam sign, but in what way does that help, given that it's not really possible to actually edit the bayes db token-by-token? This is a good point and needs some discussion. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
