http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3340
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-01 14:58 ------- Honestly, I don't believe that SVN head is supposed to have bugs. Simply because we would test our software before checking it in because in a largely shared environment, adding bugs causes headaches for the entire group, not just one individual. The majority of the bugs I have been reporting over the last few days really should have been caught earlier. Honestly, I would love to wait until 3.0 comes out, but after analyzing my logs over the last few days, I realized that my personal spam count has gone from the 2000-3000 a day to well over 10,000 a day. I need a solution that works and 2.6.x doesn't work for me. Sadly, I wish I could just change my email address and forget about all of this, but I just can't...too many old references to change. Now, with SVN head and all the 3rd party rules I could find installed, I am finally getting about 100% caught spam. But, that was a really painful 4 day process that I'm really not happy about. I'm glad SA works as well as it does, but the core design of it needs a lot of re-work and I think a lot of it could be done better. See what I say in comment#4. This would have prevented a lot of my complaining and bitterness towards this software. jon ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
