http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3338
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-03 21:44 ------- Subject: Re: flock complains a lot On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 07:54:07PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3338 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|NEW |RESOLVED > Resolution| |FIXED > > > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-03 19:54 ------- > OK, this is fixed; I had it still using non-blocking. oops. > > re: Kelsey's issue -- Kelsey, the "t" script doesn't actually exercise the > locker to the point of running multiple competing lock processes, so it > shouldn't be an issue -- flock() is still emulated on NFS enough for that test > to pass. (unless someone's not running rpc.lockd, but that's pretty > psychotic.) Gotcha there. Maybe something to keep in mind - but it may best be a stand alone file locking test tool that could be in contrib. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
