http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3348
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-04 14:32 ------- Daniel wrote: > I think we should generally follow the common behavior, but this > is one case where we probably avoid doing the thing that doesn't > let us catch the spam But following the common behavior doesn't miss the spam. In the 6.5 points I counted I missed another 1.1 points for UPPERCASE_50_75. So that's 7.6 points that this coding produces in the current SVN rules. The existing rules catch the it handily without us giving spammers a chance at figuring out a way of fooling SpamAssassin when it decodes things that the most common MUAs don't. And why add code for a rare case that is not leading to FNs? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
