http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3009
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-07 11:03 ------- Subject: Re: Contribution of antidrug rules First: regarding the combos vs 2/3 kind checks, I think both me and Dan have agreed it might be best to let the GA sort it out. I've got no objections to testing 2/3, just hesitations because of FP concerns. Unfortunately I don't think any of us subscribes to any newsletters which might create legitimate FP cases. Perhaps I'll fish around this weekend and see what I can find. As for the check-in, that's great news and the attribution change is perfectly fine with me. In the case of contributions to spamassassin proper I don't really care where attribution is made, or if it's even made at all. I figure my contributions are a small way of partially paying you back for all the hard work you all put into SpamAssassin. The only reason I put a self attribution in at all is so people would know where the file came from when distributed separate from SA proper. It seems perfectly logical to remove and replace it when integrated into SA itself. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
