On Friday, May 14, 2004, 8:06:46 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote: > Jeff Chan wrote:
>> 1 = comes from sc.surbl.org >> 2 = comes from ws.surbl.org (and be.surbl.org) >> 4 = comes from phishing list > Nice, although I'd prefer 2, 4, 8, etc. without 1. 127.0.0.1 > pops up under the strangest conditions, it's better to leave > it alone. I vaguely recall a case when 127.0.0.1 was on the > SCBL and parts of the internet stopped to work ;-) Bye, Frank Thanks Frank, In principle, this shouldn't be an issue since SURBLs should only used on message bodies and not headers*, but perhaps we should change to 2,4,8 to be safe and like other RBLs. * If 127.0.0.1 appeared on a regular message-header-parsing RBL, then I could see how that could potentially break things since the loopback address can show up as a hop in mail processing. (Numeric RBLs often start at .2 probably for that reason.) Does anyone have any additional comments on this question? Jeff C.
