Hello, I don't think the AOL rule is important from the big hitter standpoint but from the 100% no false positive standpoint.
And yes, the URI rule was mine as well. Regards, KAM ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Menschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 10:30 PM Subject: Re: [Bug 3390] New: Rule based on Kelson Vibber's MD code for bogus AOL Addresses > Hello bugzilla-daemon, > > Thursday, May 13, 2004, 8:59:36 PM, Bugzilla transmitted: > > k> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3390 > k> Summary: Rule based on Kelson Vibber's MD code for bogus AOL > k> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > k> # Rule based on Kelson Vibber's MD code for bogus AOL Addresses > k> # Check for bogus AOL addresses as described at > k> # http://postmaster.aol.com/faq/mailerfaq.html#syntax > k> # - all alphanumeric, starting with a letter, from 3 to 16 characters long. > > Looks decent here, but not a big hitter. > OVERALL SPAM HAM S/O SCORE NAME > 98444 76837 21607 0.781 0.00 0.00 (all messages) > 38 38 0 1.000 0.00 3.00 KAM_COMBO_BADAOL > > OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME > 98444 76837 21607 0.781 0.00 0.00 (all messages) > 100.000 78.0515 21.9485 0.781 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %) > 0.039 0.0495 0.0000 1.000 0.00 3.00 KAM_COMBO_BADAOL > > BTW, I'm working on the HTML coding rule set for SARE, and one of the > rules we're testing/rescoring is > uri SARE_HTML_URI_BUG /(\%0[01]|\0).*\@/i > describe SARE_HTML_URI_BUG Attempted use of URI bug. > score SARE_HTML_URI_BUG 1.000 # type=spamg > #stype SARE_HTML_URI_BUG spamg > #counts SARE_HTML_URI_BUG 9s/0h of 98542 corpus (76935s/21607h) 05/12/04 > #hist SARE_HTML_URI_BUG KAM_URIPARSE > > This one was yours, yes? > > Bob Menschel > > >
