http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3416
Summary: Spam with empty body
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the last month, I've received 9 spam with empty bodies, which would make
them 1.5% of my spam that month. Some others came in january. Two of these got
through, the problem of course being that the ruleset had not much information
to catch, not to mention bayes (hits about 65%, after all).
So I suggest a MISSING_BODY rule to complement MISSING_SUBJECT et al - any
objections? Would we run into issues with listservers etc.?
Don't know whether this is caused by a bad setup at the spammer's side, or if
they just want to be annoying. This might be exploited to send spam just in
the subject - say "Important Notification - see [url]" (where URIDNSBL could
kick in of course).
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
