As I was concerned about, it seems to really hurt SPAM% for someone out
there, Michael Parker in this case, probably due to a trusted networks
problem.  Even XBL is blown out of the water.  I think the change is a
good one, but the cost might be too high.

His results:

------- start of cut text --------------
  9.047  18.8956   0.1090    0.994   0.93    1.00  RCVD_IN_XBL
  1.285   2.7011   0.0000    1.000   0.69    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_XBL

  5.803  12.1729   0.0218    0.998   0.92    2.25  RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
  3.181   6.6867   0.0000    1.000   0.85    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET

 24.817  51.9568   0.1852    0.996   0.94    1.10  RCVD_IN_DSBL
  3.667   7.7071   0.0000    1.000   0.87    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_DSBL

  2.176   4.5738   0.0000    1.000   0.78    0.00  __T_RCVD_IN_NJABL
 15.861  32.4730   0.7845    0.976   0.72    0.00  __RCVD_IN_NJABL

 16.095  33.6495   0.1634    0.995   0.93    0.00  __RCVD_IN_SBL_XBL
  5.072  10.6603   0.0000    1.000   0.92    0.00  __T_RCVD_IN_SBL_XBL

  9.967  20.9004   0.0436    0.998   0.96    1.20  RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY
  1.382   2.9052   0.0000    1.000   0.70    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY

  7.379  15.4742   0.0327    0.998   0.94    1.20  RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC
  1.005   2.1128   0.0000    1.000   0.65    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC

  6.717  13.8655   0.2288    0.984   0.85    0.10  RCVD_IN_RFCI
  0.708   1.4886   0.0000    1.000   0.60    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_RFCI

  7.357  15.4022   0.0545    0.996   0.93    2.55  RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
  3.016   6.3385   0.0000    1.000   0.84    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL

  6.854  14.3577   0.0436    0.997   0.92    1.20  RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP
  0.817   1.7167   0.0000    1.000   0.62    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP

  6.014  12.6411   0.0000    1.000   0.94    0.00  __T_RCVD_IN_SORBS
 32.694  64.2257   4.0750    0.940   0.61    0.00  __RCVD_IN_SORBS

  1.034   2.1729   0.0000    1.000   0.66    0.62  RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP
  0.514   1.0804   0.0000    1.000   0.57    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP

  2.108   4.4178   0.0109    0.998   0.76    0.53  RCVD_IN_RSL
  0.137   0.2881   0.0000    1.000   0.48    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_RSL

  1.862   3.8896   0.0218    0.994   0.74    1.20  RCVD_IN_SORBS_SMTP
  0.160   0.3361   0.0000    1.000   0.49    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SMTP

  7.482  15.6663   0.0545    0.997   0.94    1.27  RCVD_IN_SBL
  3.804   7.9952   0.0000    1.000   0.88    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_SBL

  0.491   1.0324   0.0000    1.000   0.56    1.62  RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS
  0.074   0.1561   0.0000    1.000   0.46    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS

  2.605   5.4622   0.0109    0.998   0.80    0.74  RCVD_IN_NJABL_SPAM
  0.268   0.5642   0.0000    1.000   0.51    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_NJABL_SPAM

  0.331   0.6963   0.0000    1.000   0.53    2.90  RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
  0.057   0.1200   0.0000    1.000   0.46    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB

  0.057   0.1200   0.0000    1.000   0.46    1.41  RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY
  0.011   0.0240   0.0000    1.000   0.45    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY

  0.097   0.2041   0.0000    1.000   0.47    2.70  RCVD_IN_SORBS_ZOMBIE
  0.011   0.0240   0.0000    1.000   0.45    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_SORBS_ZOMBIE

  0.000   0.0000   0.0000    0.500   0.44   -0.01  T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LIST

  0.000   0.0000   0.0000    0.500   0.44    0.10  RCVD_IN_NJABL_MULTI
  0.000   0.0000   0.0000    0.500   0.44    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_NJABL_MULTI

  0.000   0.0000   0.0000    0.500   0.44   -0.01  T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LIST_T

  0.000   0.0000   0.0000    0.500   0.44    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_SORBS_BLOCK
  0.000   0.0000   0.0000    0.500   0.44    0.00  RCVD_IN_SORBS_BLOCK

  0.000   0.0000   0.0000    0.500   0.44    0.10  RCVD_IN_NJABL_CGI
  0.000   0.0000   0.0000    0.500   0.44    0.01  T_RCVD_IN_NJABL_CGI
------- end ----------------------------

-- 
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/

Reply via email to