http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3435
Summary: Support for --long-options for spamc?
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: spamc/spamd
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 27 May 2004 22:07 CET Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> On Thursday 27 May 2004 21:40 CET Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 May 2004 20:26 CET Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> > > On Thursday 27 May 2004 20:14 CET Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > > > Added often-requested -V switch to spamc. Finally one can check out
> > > > > which version of spamc is installed on his box :)
> > > >
> > > > It would be better if we supported the standard GNU options --version
> > > > and --help in all of our tools. -v vs. -V for version and -h or -? or
> > > > -H for help is too inconsistent from Unix tool to Unix tool.
> > >
> > > ACK. But spamc doesn't support getopt_long() at all -- I'd like to see
> > > it in there though. Shall I add it?
> >
> > I'm in favor of adding getopt_long, although we might want to make sure
> > it works on systems that don't have it installed.
>
> We could either include some replace code like we already do for getopt()
> on Windows or note that the long options aren't available on all systems.
> I prefer the latter for now.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
