http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3455





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-06-01 12:01 -------
Subject: Re:  SORTED_RECIPS false positives

> it seems like a high scoring rule for something that could potentially
> happen fairly easily by a novice user that just puts emails addresses
> in his address book and/or contacts -- and not actual names.

Thanks.  Please do find out more.

The rule does work pretty darn well, though:

overall:

OVERALL%   SPAM%     HAM%     S/O    RANK   SCORE  NAME
 464229   414547    49682    0.893   0.00    0.00  (all messages)
100.000  89.2980  10.7020    0.893   0.00    0.00  (all messages as %)
  1.890   2.1163   0.0040    0.998   0.86    4.30  SORTED_RECIPS

by users:

  0.218   0.4642   0.0000    1.000   0.50    4.30  SORTED_RECIPS:bzoetekouw
  0.101   0.1573   0.0533    0.747   0.49    4.30  SORTED_RECIPS:cthielen
  0.188   0.3751   0.0000    1.000   0.53    4.30  SORTED_RECIPS:jm
  0.272   0.3828   0.0000    1.000   0.46    4.30  SORTED_RECIPS:lan
  2.133   4.4447   0.0000    1.000   0.80    4.30  SORTED_RECIPS:parkerm
  0.010   0.0200   0.0000    1.000   0.47    4.30  SORTED_RECIPS:quinlan
  0.060   0.0740   0.0000    1.000   0.51    4.30  SORTED_RECIPS:rODbegbie
  2.361   2.3704   0.0000    1.000   0.86    4.30  SORTED_RECIPS:theo

by age in months:

  2.193   2.2741   0.0000    1.000   0.87    4.30  SORTED_RECIPS:0-1
  0.461   0.6311   0.0000    1.000   0.60    4.30  SORTED_RECIPS:1-3
  0.933   1.2098   0.0187    0.985   0.66    4.30  SORTED_RECIPS:3-6





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to