Hi! > > Yes, but I want to add that there _WILL_ be a "BigEvil style" cf version of > > ws.surbl.org for those people who won't/can't use the SURBL net lookups for > > some strange reason. This is still being worked on. One of the main reasons > > I haven't updates BE in a while is because I've been working on the new WS > > submission stuff. (Thanks to everyone who is involved in that!) > > Thanks, I forgot about that other direction of rules style > entries moving from sa-blacklist back into bigevil.cf. Sounds > like the best of both worlds in a nice mirror of both types: > > A. ws.surbl.org gets all the "static" domains from BigEvil, > sa-blacklist, etc. in the form of a SURBL. > > B. BigEvil.cf gets all the domains, including those from > sa-blacklist, heavily wildcarded ones, etc. in the form of a > ruleset.
I dont see the problem listsing them inside a SURBL. The extra few kb it will take on the nameservers ? For me i would like to put the preassure on DNS, not on every single box that has to do expression lookups, those will cost a lot more CPU... Most of the times its not the nameservers that cant keep up, but the mailboxes... > Also: *when should we announce that be domains are now in ws, and > that people should stop using be?* Is everyone comfortable that > the combined ws is now working as expected, including the be > domains being folded in? Yes. Let me know when i should start slaving them. Same applies for the rsync... Bye, Raymond.
