http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3536
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-24 00:02 ------- : jm 1259...; grep trusted_networks ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs # trusted_networks 212.17.35.15 212.17.35.167 64.81.84.115 # trusted_networks 213.228.0/24 : jm 1260...; ./spamassassin -D -Lt < tst > o debug: SpamAssassin version 3.0.0-pre1-r21475 debug: Score set 0 chosen. ...... debug: metadata: X-Spam-Relays-Trusted: debug: metadata: X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted: [ ip=192.117.255.50 rdns=r-255-50.aquanet.co.il helo=192.168.3.6 by=relay.icomedias.com ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=i5O64tt6014516 ] .... debug: is spam? score=0.835 required=5 debug: tests=BAYES_10,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID,UPPERCASE_25_50 debug: subtests=__CT,__CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY,__CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT,__HAS_MSGID,__HAS_SUBJECT,__HAS_XOAT,__MIME_VERSION,__MSGID_OK_DIGITS,__MSGID_OK_HOST,__SANE_MSGID,__UPPERCASE_25_50 no ALL_TRUSTED hit here, and it correctly considers "192.168.3.6" as the HELO, not the IP. are you seeing diff behaviour? could you post your ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs, your local.cf files, and the output of "spamassassin -D -Lt < msg"? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
