On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 02:09:31PM +1200, Scott Truman wrote: > I was wondering if there was any option to skip the "net" tests > (RBLs, DCC etc) if the email was scored as spam sufficiently by the > local tests? If there is not, would this be considered a good option for
Nope. There is no short-cutting code at all right now. > enough to score an email over a certain threshold, say 15, then any net > tests are basically a waste of time and resources IMO. "net" tests with I was actually chatting with another developer in IM about this very idea last night. It sounds like a good idea, except, that it's more efficient to launch the RBL tests in the background at the start, then run the local tests, then check the network test results. The likelihood is that you'll have to do network checks on more of your mail than the amount the short cut would be used on, so you're likely to end up spending more time per message since you'll always be waiting to start the network checks. > Also, am I correct in thinking that net tests with a score of 0.0 are > not run at all? Right. Any test with a 0 score is not run. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "And the next time you consider complaining that running Lucid Emacs 19.05 via NFS from a remote Linux machine in Paraguay doesn't seem to get the background colors right, you'll know who to thank." (By Matt Welsh)
pgpVGcSPMEepc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
