http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3575
Summary: SA 3.0pre1 causes broken header
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: spamassassin
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is an odd bug, but it's completely repeatable, so I decided to report. A
daily blog update I subscribe to always breaks the headers in the same way
under SA 3.0pre1, but didn't under 2.63. The odd thing is that the SA
processed message looks fine to me when I view it on the server, but shows up
broken in Exchange/Outlook. Specifically, when it gets forwarded to Outlook,
the body of the message shows:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0-pre1 (2004-06-19) on emlis.pair.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTTP_WITH_EMAIL_IN_URL autolearn=no
version=3.0.0-pre1
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2004 06:48:18.0671 (UTC) FILETIME=
[3889C7F0:01C46325]
Here are the entries from Jul 5, 2004 for View From the Wing -
(http://www.webflyer.com/blog/)
[rest elided]
The header of the message (viewable in Outlook under View: Options) is:
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from emlis.pair.com ([209.68.2.61]) by exchange2003.ad.skymv.com
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);
Mon, 5 Jul 2004 23:48:18 -0700
Received: (qmail 39932 invoked by uid 3368); 6 Jul 2004 06:32:26 -0000
Delivered-To: dankohn-dankohn:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 39909 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2004 06:32:20 -0000
Received: from www.webflyer.com (64.78.185.89)
by emlis.pair.com with SMTP; 6 Jul 2004 06:32:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 13493 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jul 2004 06:31:10 -0000
Date: 6 Jul 2004 06:31:10 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: View From the Wing - Entries for Jul 5, 2004
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
That is, it appears that an extra return is getting inserted after the Mime-
Version header that is mistakenly causing the rest of the headers to be
treated as the body. I've attached the original message and the SA-processed
message before forwarding, and I can't see any problems with either. However,
the same header flaw gets repeated every day on this blog update, but with no
other mail.
I thought I'd post in case the cause of the problem is more obvious to others.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
