http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3627
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-21 21:51 ------- +1 I think it makes little sense for HABEAS_USER to have a different score from RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED. (Incidentally, note that HABEAS_USER is not using -trusted, it probably should.) Note: the HABEAS_USER ham hit rate is artificially high because Craig Hughes is listed and I've corresponded directly with Habeas. In contrast, Bonded Sender doesn't list IronPort. In fact, it doesn't list anyone who has not put up a bond. (*All* of my hits are Craig Hughes and Habeas personnel.) Re: SPF_FAIL, I'd give it a 0.001 score since it's basically free if SPF is run at all. Re: the bugs you note, let's track those separately since they'll take more thought to fix right, I think. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
