http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3331
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-04 16:09 ------- I really like how all the effects of this addition disappear into no overhead if the option is set not to use it and the schema is set accordingly. I agree that the default should be set for low volume users who may want to see the tokens in order to better understand how Bayes works with their mail. If we do that that we should document somewhere that is *very* hard to miss that we have a set of suggestions for configuring SpamAssassin for high volume sites, and write something up about all the tweaks that might be necessary for high volumes. A HighPerformance entry in the Wiki would be fine if there is a pointer to it. I'm +1 on getting this in 3.0. If we don't then we have to deal with people wanting to get their Bayes tokens information back, and then deal again with letting them know that they have them again in 3.1 but that they have to change their schemas yet again. If we do it now we may get away with no schema change for 3.1. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
