"Christian Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have very good results running AWL and Bayes of current 3.0 with > SDBM_File (included with Perl 5.4). It's much faster than DB_File and > file sizes are also decent.
Interesting... can you post some benchmarks? The AnyDBM_File documentation says it's slower and I think that was our experience as well. I think we'd like to also know that it produces exactly the same results for checking/learning/dumping. > Why did SDBM_File support ever get pulled? =) Patches available if > you're interested. It was getting too hard to support N-different local DBM modules so we went with the one that worked the best overall. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
