http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3734
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-30 10:17 ------- Subject: Re: Why are the URIBL rules header and not body? > given that autolearning requires "header hits" and "body hits" combined, it > really *should* be considered a body test, for autolearning at least... We should just have a new type for evals that get "no" arguments (other than perhaps the $self object and the rule name). "body" isn't right either. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
