Heh, one of my personal pet peeves is that people don't use string libraries where xxx123xxx sorts ahead of xxx20xxx -- I can't really think of any situation ever where you would want sorting to happen the other way.  Ever.  I remember back in the early 90s a guy I knew at Stanford wrote an extension for the Mac which patched the System 7 internal StringCompare function to redefine sorting in this way, so that things like the Finder would just work right when sorting numbered files.  I thought it was an absolutely elegant hack, and have endeavored to follow its example since whenever writing a string compare routine for any reason.  Being a stubborn SOB, I tend therefore to use a natural file numbering, version numbering, etc system without superfluous zeros, and simply to encourage people in the outside world to get their string-sorting acts collectively together.

C

On Wed, 2002-01-23 at 14:54, dman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 08:43:47PM +0000, Ged Haywood wrote:
| Hi there,
| 
| On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Donald Greer wrote:
| 
| >    Might I suggest a 2-prong numbering system (similar to Linux Kernel) 
| [snip]
| >    So, perhaps the release posted this morning would be "2.0.0"? and the 
| > devel release "2.1.0"? (or maybe "2.1.2023 -- 2.1.[4-digit julian date]) 
| > so that the numbering could be handled automagically by the cron scripts 
| 
| I'd suggest a two digit minor version number, for example 2.01.2023
| rather than 2.1.2023, because then we don't have the stupidity of
| version 2.2.2023 being older than 2.14.4096 (like Apache does it:).

It doesn't make it older, just that string sorting no longer matches
version ordering.  A minor detail, as far as I am concerned.  (I don't
really care which textual style is used)

-D

-- 

After you install Microsoft Windows XP, you have the option to create
user accounts.  If you create user accounts, by default, they will have
an account type of administrator with no password.
                                                            -- bugtraq


_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk


Reply via email to