Daniel,
Being an old AI/GA programmer who just started using
SA, your post fascinates me. Thanks for the update on
your research.
On Mon:22:07, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
[...]
> My only gripe is that having so many rules is somewhat clumsy in the
> scores file, even using arguments. What if spamassassin supported
> something like this?
>
> header DATE_SHIFT_PAST eval:check_for_shifted_date($1, $2)
> describe DATE_SHIFT_PAST Date: is $1 to $2 hours before Received: date
> iterations DATE_SHIFT_PAST (3,6),(6,12),(12,18),(24,48),(48,96),(96,Infinity)
>
> score DATE_SHIFT_PAST(3,6) 0.541
> score DATE_SHIFT_PAST(6,12) 1.249
> ...
It seems to me that it would be interesting to consider a _summary_ of
a.) The percentage of false positives and
negatives _before_ testing for date differences
b.) The percentage of false positives and
negatives _after_ testing for date differences
c.) _How_many_ more rules would be added.
Thanks,
Kingsley
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
