Vivek Khera wrote: >>>>>> "r" == rOD <rODbegbie> writes: > > r> Vivek Khera wrote: >>> But how many of those were scoring 5 or more to be flagged as spam >>> as well? > > r> [rod@blazing masses]$ cat nonspam-rODbegbie.log | grep ^Y | grep > PORN | wc r> 197 788 40835 > > r> So, about 4% of my non-spam matches a PRON rule. > > And SA marked them as spam? It is not relevent unless SA marked the > message as spam.
Yes, that's what the ^Y is for. 4% of my non-spam would be given a false-positive by SA, and part of that would be triggering a PORN rule. Note that this is using the current CVS release, the scores of which haven't been fully GA'd yet. rOD. -- Before Stonehenge, there was Woodhenge and Strawhenge. >> Doing the blogging thang again at http://www.groovymother.com/ << _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
