It works properly during the tests.
-----Original Message-----
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:00 PM
To: Doug Dempsey
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Not Tagging
<< File: ATT00073.dat >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 12:50:52PM -0500, Doug
Dempsey wrote:
> Why would SA not be tagging spam when the required hits have been
exceeded?
>
> qmail-scanner-1.12 (uvscan: v4.1.60/v4224. spamassassin: 2.41. .
> Clear:SA:0(21.5/6.0):. Processed in 1.799955 secs); 25 Sep 2002
> 17:49:15 -0000
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=21.5 required=6.0
Since it's not listing out the tests= or version= bits, I'm assuming
qmail-scanner isn't doing the right thing. Does SA work properly when
you just use it instead of qmail-scanner?
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Y'know, there are other possibilities if we assume that filenames
are UTF-8...yikes...wait, put down that meat cleaver! Aieeee!!!
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
