You aren't using spamassassin -t when calling from mimedefang are you? (note that -t, which is a test mode, always includes the body markup, even in nonspam. You must use the headers to tell the difference in that case)
also, what does the x-spam-status header look like?
Was the subject tagged too?
At 05:01 PM 11/27/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Well, even in my calculation it was right :-) But why gets a score of 3.6 tagged, if a score of 5 is required? 8.6 would have been...Tilman Am Mittwoch, 27.11.02 um 16:41 Uhr schrieb Vivek Khera:"TK" == Tilman Kastner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:TK> Obviously, the negative score did not apply to the TK> sum. (It's a custom rule to avoid false positives). Where did you learn arithmetic? ;-) It adds up fine in my calculation. What score did you expect to get from adding up all those rules?
--
Tilman Kastner DEVICE/N GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ilse-ter-Meer-Weg 7
PGP key available 30449 Hannover, Germany
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
